Knowledge Hub – FIDIC 1999 Books Clause Commentaries
Written by Corbett Lawyers |
December 21, 2016
Click on any of the documents below to read Corbett & Co.’s helpful commentary on FIDIC 1999 books clause commentaries: –
- FIDIC 1999 Books – Commentary on Clause 1
- FIDIC 1999 Books – Commentary on Clause 2
- FIDIC 1999 Books – Commentary on Clause 3
- FIDIC 1999 Books – Commentary on Clause 4
- FIDIC 1999 Books – Commentary on Clause 5
- FIDIC 1999 Books – Commentary on Clause 6
- FIDIC 1999 Books – Commentary on Clause 7
- FIDIC 1999 Books – Commentary on Clause 8
- FIDIC 1999 Books – Commentary on Clause 9
- FIDIC 1999 Books – Commentary on Clause 10
- FIDIC 1999 Books – Commentary on Clause 11
- FIDIC 1999 Books – Commentary on Clause 12
- FIDIC 1999 Books – Commentary on Clause 13
- FIDIC 1999 Books – Commentary on Clause 14
- FIDIC 1999 Books – Commentary on Clause 15
- FIDIC 1999 Books – Commentary on Clause 16
- FIDIC 1999 Books – Commentary on Clause 17
- FIDIC 1999 Books – Commentary on Clause 19
- FIDIC 1999 Books – Commentary on Clause 20
These articles can also be found via the Knowledge Hub search.
Related
The Dangers of Employer Set Off in your FIDIC Contract: Suspension and Termination
Unfortunately, under the FIDIC Red and Yellow Books 1999, the right of an Employer to set off from an amount already certified in a Payment Certificate but unpaid is inexplicit. Once the Employer has a Sub-Clause 3.5 determination, it may ask the Engineer to deduct the amount determined from the next Payment Certificate. This is clear. But rather than rely on the Engineer, can the Employer instead, itself, deduct by way of set off from an amount already certified in a Payment Certificate but unpaid? This is not clear.
International Arbitration and Third Party Funding: Time to Rethink Reward and Risk?
Introduction The English Commercial Court has now confirmed in two separate decisions that an arbitral tribunal may award a winning claimant its third party funding costs. How significant are these decisions and it is time to rethink the potential reward and risk of international arbitration? The First Decision – Essar v. Norscot (2016)[1] This case concerned an
Corbett & Co. Director Joanne Clarke to present MBL Webinar on International Arbitration in Construction & Engineering Disputes – An Introduction
Corbett & Co. Director Joanne Clarke is presenting an MBL Webinar on International Arbitration in Construction & Engineering Disputes. The webinar will be streamed at 12:30pm on Friday 16 December 2022 and will remain available
Corbett & Co. Director Joanne Clarke to present MBL Webinar on International Construction & Engineering Disputes – Dispute Resolution Clauses & Boards
Corbett & Co. Director Joanne Clarke is presenting an MBL Webinar on International Construction & Engineering Disputes - Dispute Resolution Clauses & Boards. The webinar will be streamed at 12:30pm on Friday 9 December 2022
The Dangers of Employer Set Off in your FIDIC Contract: Suspension and Termination
Unfortunately, under the FIDIC Red and Yellow Books 1999, the right of an Employer to set off from an amount already certified in a Payment Certificate but unpaid is inexplicit. Once the Employer has a Sub-Clause 3.5 determination, it may ask the Engineer to deduct the amount determined from the next Payment Certificate. This is clear. But rather than rely on the Engineer, can the Employer instead, itself, deduct by way of set off from an amount already certified in a Payment Certificate but unpaid? This is not clear.
International Arbitration and Third Party Funding: Time to Rethink Reward and Risk?
Introduction The English Commercial Court has now confirmed in two separate decisions that an arbitral tribunal may award a winning claimant its third party funding costs. How significant are these decisions and it is time
